Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

Qualitative assessments utilize non-numerical categories to evaluate risk by focusing on the characteristics, nature, and significance of the risks involved rather than assigning numerical values. This approach allows for a more subjective analysis, often using descriptive ratings or categories such as "high," "medium," and "low," enabling a nuanced understanding of risks that may be difficult to quantify.

In contrast, quantitative assessments rely on numerical data to calculate risk levels, such as probabilities and financial impacts, which means they do not leverage the categorical evaluations provided by qualitative assessments. Statistical assessments, while potentially providing numerical analyses, fundamentally differ in approach and focus, often emphasizing data trends rather than subjective categories. Similarly, comparative assessments analyze risks by comparing them to one another but do not inherently categorize risks into non-numerical labels. Therefore, the use of non-numerical categories firmly identifies qualitative assessments as the correct type for evaluating risk in this context.